When KSE 100 is the better starting point
KSE100 is usually the stronger route when you want broader PSX benchmark exposure, more names to filter, and a wider list to trim into a custom allocation basket. It fits investors who want a market-representative starting list before narrowing their watchlist.
When KMI 30 is the better starting point
KMI30 is often easier to review when you want a smaller and more focused universe. That tighter starting point can make it faster to compare constituent weights and move into a manageable stock-by-stock plan.
How PSX IndexMate keeps the workflow consistent
Both routes follow the same product logic: fetch the source table, preserve index-weight context, normalize a filtered basket, then estimate allocated capital and whole-share counts from the amount you enter. That means your index choice affects the starting universe more than the planning mechanics.